 |
| Xu Kai Defamation Case Update Court Publishes Netizen Public Apology Statement (Photo: China.com) |
A legal update involving Chinese actor Xu Kai has quietly but firmly drawn public attention this week, after a court officially released a written apology connected to a defamation case. On 14 January, the court published a formal apology statement from a netizen identified as Liu Moumou, marking the latest development in a dispute that began with harmful online remarks last year.
According to the court statement, Liu Moumou admitted to posting insulting and defamatory comments about Xu Kai through a personal social media account. The court confirmed that these remarks were entirely untrue, irresponsible, and caused reputational harm to the actor, as well as negative social impact more broadly.
In the published apology, Liu Moumou openly acknowledged the wrongdoing, stating that the comments were made without factual basis or proper judgement.
The statement emphasised a full recognition of fault and included a sincere, public apology addressed directly to Xu Kai for the consequences caused by the posts.
As part of the legal resolution, Liu Moumou also shared a handwritten apology letter on the same social media account used to spread the defamatory content.
This step was carried out in accordance with court requirements and is considered part of the formal process to restore the affected party’s reputation.
The apology letter further included a clear commitment from Liu Moumou to regulate future online behaviour and to never again publish, spread, or create content that could harm Xu Kai’s name.
 |
The court noted that the case serves as a reminder that online speech carries real legal responsibility, particularly when it involves public figures.
Following the publication, reactions from fans and netizens have been mixed. Many fans of Xu Kai expressed relief, seeing the apology as a long-overdue acknowledgment of accountability.
Some praised the legal process for addressing online misinformation directly, while others called for even stronger measures to discourage careless online attacks. Meanwhile, a number of netizens viewed the case as a cautionary tale, warning against treating social media as a space without consequences.
This case once again highlights how quickly online comments can escalate into legal matters, and how public apologies are increasingly becoming part of digital accountability.
What are your thoughts on court-mandated apologies in online defamation cases? Do you think they truly change online behaviour, or are stronger actions still needed?