 |
| Yang Mi Studio Calls for Answers After Weibo Night 2025 Seating Storm Sparks Online Debate (Photo: Sohu) |
The glitz and glamour of Weibo Night 2025 was meant to celebrate the biggest names in Chinese entertainment, but this year’s event quickly became a hot topic for an entirely different reason. Actress Yang Mi unexpectedly found herself trending across social media after a seating arrangement controversy spiralled into a full-scale online debate, prompting her studio to publicly demand clarification from the event organisers.
The annual Weibo Night is widely known as one of the most prestigious gatherings in the Chinese entertainment industry, where seating arrangements often carry symbolic meaning linked to an artist’s popularity, achievements, and industry influence. However, long before the ceremony officially began, speculation over seating placements triggered waves of discussion, with Yang Mi’s position at the centre of the front row becoming the focal point of intense scrutiny.
According to circulating venue photos released ahead of the main ceremony, Yang Mi had been seated in the centre position, commonly referred to as the “C position,” from the start.
 |
Despite this, certain fandom groups began spreading alternative seating maps claiming that two celebrities were originally placed in the central spot.
These unofficial diagrams quickly gained traction online and were used to support claims suggesting Yang Mi had taken over the central seat.
 |
The controversy escalated further when videos surfaced showing staff members adjusting name tags in the seating area during the event.
Some online users interpreted this as evidence of last-minute changes involving Yang Mi’s team. However, supporters of the actress argued that the clips were taken during the awards segment and had no direct connection to seat allocation decisions.
Adding fuel to the situation, another image circulated online showed only one guest name in the seating zone, which was then used to question the legitimacy of the final arrangement.
Yang Mi’s fan community quickly pushed back, demanding the organisers verify the authenticity of the circulating images and clarify whether they had been altered or misinterpreted.
 |
As the discussion intensified, Yang Mi’s studio broke its silence on the evening of February 5 with a strongly worded post expressing shock and frustration. The statement described the situation as sudden and puzzling, directly urging Weibo Night organisers to provide a clear explanation.
The post rapidly gained massive attention, gathering more than one million likes within just over an hour and triggering widespread support from her fans.
Not long after, while the ceremony was still ongoing, the official Weibo Night account responded publicly.
The organisers explained that the confusion stemmed from a staff error during a routine rechecking process, stating that name tag stickers were mistakenly placed after the venue had already been arranged earlier in the day. The platform issued an apology to the artists involved as well as their fan communities.
 |
Despite the official response, discussions surrounding the controversy continued to grow. Some online users remained sceptical, referencing rumours claiming that Yang Mi’s team had requested seating adjustments that allegedly affected other celebrities’ placements.
Other reports suggested that the seating arrangement shifted from a three-person sofa to a two-person layout, which sparked speculation involving several artists attending the event.
Observers also noted that seating hierarchy remains an unofficial yet highly sensitive aspect of major Chinese entertainment events.
Fans and industry watchers often interpret seat placement as a reflection of career status, recent achievements, and influence within the entertainment landscape. As a result, even minor adjustments can quickly spark heated debate among fandom communities.
Meanwhile, inside the venue, Yang Mi was seen interacting comfortably with fellow attendees, including actress Xin Zhilei, with both appearing unaffected by the online speculation.
 |
| Sohu |
The two were spotted chatting throughout the ceremony, which some fans pointed out as proof that the controversy did not impact their professional relationship.
Netizens’ reactions to the situation have been sharply divided. Supporters of Yang Mi argued that the actress had been unfairly targeted based on unverified online diagrams and edited visuals.
Many insisted that seating decisions are typically controlled by event organisers rather than individual artists, urging the public to avoid directing blame without confirmed evidence.
On the other hand, some online commentators focused on the broader issue of seating symbolism in the entertainment industry, arguing that fan culture has become overly sensitive to ranking systems. A portion of viewers expressed frustration that discussions about seating overshadowed the event’s purpose of celebrating artistic achievements.
 |
There were also neutral voices suggesting that the incident highlights how quickly misinformation can spread during high-profile events. Several industry watchers emphasised the importance of official transparency to prevent speculation from escalating into unnecessary fan conflicts.
Interestingly, the controversy also sparked renewed discussion about shifting industry influence, with some observers analysing how recent award wins and project success continue to shape seating prominence at major ceremonies. The topic quickly evolved from a single seating dispute into a wider conversation about star power dynamics in Chinese entertainment.
Although Weibo Night has already issued its apology, the incident remains a trending topic across social media platforms, showing how closely fans monitor even the smallest details surrounding their favourite celebrities.
What do you think about the Weibo Night seating controversy? Do you believe the situation was simply a logistical mistake, or does it reflect deeper fandom competition and industry hierarchy?