 |
| Yao Chen’s Past Remarks on Speed Viewing Trigger Fresh Online Debate (Photo: Weibo) |
An old television clip has unexpectedly pulled top Chinese actress Yao Chen back into the public spotlight, proving once again how fast archived moments can spark brand-new online storms. A past comment she made about speed-watching films and dramas resurfaced on 8 January, quickly going viral and igniting heated debate across social media platforms.
The short clip, taken from an earlier programme appearance, shows Yao openly questioning the growing habit of watching films and long dramas at double speed or consuming entire stories through condensed video explainers.
While the remarks were originally part of a broader discussion on creative value, the edited version circulating online quickly drew sharp interpretations, with some viewers reading it as criticism directed at audiences themselves.
 |
As reactions intensified, Yao Chen’s studio moved swiftly to address the situation. In an official statement released via its account, the management stressed that the viral video was the result of selective cutting and splicing, removing crucial context from Yao’s original discussion.
According to the studio, the edited footage seriously distorted her intent and was designed to provoke negative public sentiment. The statement reaffirmed that throughout her career, Yao Chen has consistently shown respect for acting as an art form, for film and television creators, and for audiences alike.
The studio emphasised that she has always communicated with viewers through her work rather than speaking down to them, firmly rejecting claims that she looks down on how people choose to watch content.
Management also described the spread of the edited clip as organised and deliberately provocative, urging the public to remain rational and avoid being influenced by misleading narratives.
 |
It confirmed that legal representatives have been appointed to collect evidence, with further action being considered to protect Yao Chen’s reputation and lawful rights.
Despite the clarification, the online discussion continues to evolve, with netizen reactions remaining sharply divided.
Some viewers agreed with Yao Chen’s original point, arguing that speed-watching and five-minute summaries strip long-form storytelling of its emotional depth and narrative rhythm. They believe that quality productions deserve patience, especially considering the years of effort poured into scripts, filming, and post-production.
Others, however, pushed back strongly. Many netizens argued that speed-watching is not the problem but rather a symptom of industry issues such as overstretched episode counts, repetitive scenes, and diluted storytelling.
 |
Classic dramas were frequently cited as examples of shows that audiences willingly watch at normal speed, or even revisit multiple times, because of strong performances and dense storytelling.
Some comments went further, pointing out that viewers today face tight schedules and high work pressure, making efficient viewing a practical choice rather than a sign of disrespect. From this perspective, playback speed controls are seen as a response to market supply, not a threat to artistic integrity.
There were also voices shifting the conversation back to the industry itself, suggesting that instead of criticising how audiences consume content, creators and platforms should reflect on why viewers feel the need to fast-forward in the first place.
To many, the progress bar and playback speed are simply honest feedback tools in a content-saturated era. Ultimately, the renewed debate around speed-watching has reopened a long-running question within the film and television world: is the issue rooted in viewing habits, or in how stories are being made and delivered?
What do you think? Is speed-watching a fair response to modern dramas, or does it undermine the effort behind long-form storytelling?