 |
| "Is She Alright?" C-netz Question Si Xiaodi's New Viral Photos as She Says She's Not Afraid of Legal Action. (Credits: Sina/Weibo) |
Fresh allegations involving Lu Han have thrown Chinese entertainment back into the spotlight after influencer Si Xiaodi (iamroosie) resurfaced with a new batch of photos, chat screenshots and claims suggesting they shared a relationship beyond friendship. While the posts quickly fuelled another wave of online speculation, the biggest surprise for many fans was Lu Han's studio choosing to recycle its January legal statement instead of offering a fresh response, sparking almost as much criticism as the allegations themselves.
The renewed controversy began after Si Xiaodi, also known online as @iamroosie, uploaded 18 new posts containing what she described as evidence supporting her allegations. The collection included screenshots of conversations, concert tickets, photographs from gatherings, video call images and pictures of a red-haired man whose face remained hidden.
 |
She also shared an alleged conversation with someone saved as "Han", claiming she received an 8,888 RMB Lunar New Year gift transfer. Several posts also mentioned other celebrities, including Fan Chengcheng, Mai Chao, Zhang Yuan and others, broadening the online discussion far beyond a single name.
Much of the attention inevitably focused on Lu Han because of his long-term public relationship with Guan Xiaotong. Since Si Xiaodi claimed the two had allegedly known each other since 2023, some internet users questioned whether her timeline overlapped with Lu Han's relationship.
 |
The speculation spread rapidly despite there being no verified evidence confirming the allegations, with social media once again proving that rumours travel far faster than facts.
The studio's response surprised many followers. Rather than publishing an updated explanation or directly addressing the latest wave of discussion, the management team simply reposted its original January statement.
That notice maintained that the allegations were fabricated and warned that legal measures would be taken against anyone spreading false information. While the position remained unchanged, many fans felt the approach lacked urgency considering how widely the latest posts had circulated.
 |
That frustration quickly spilled onto Chinese social platforms. A growing number of fans criticised the management team for appearing passive while the actor continued losing followers across multiple platforms. Some even questioned whether the studio had underestimated how quickly online speculation could snowball.
The criticism became so widespread that hashtags questioning whether Lu Han's studio had "finally woken up" began trending. In one of the more unusual developments, supporters reportedly removed the official studio account from a major fan community, an extraordinary move that reflected just how dissatisfied parts of the fandom had become.
Apparently, reposting the same statement twice was about as popular as serving yesterday's leftovers at a dinner party. Not everyone agreed that the studio had handled the situation poorly. They argued that issuing repeated statements only gives controversial claims more attention.
From that perspective, sticking to the original legal position while allowing lawyers to handle the matter privately was viewed as the more sensible strategy. Some supporters also pointed out that engaging in endless online back-and-forth rarely changes public opinion once speculation has already taken hold.
Meanwhile, online investigators wasted little time examining the material posted by Si Xiaodi. Several technology-focused users argued that parts of the alleged evidence appeared inconsistent with genuine messaging interfaces.
 |
Among the most discussed examples were video call screenshots whose sharp square corners reportedly did not match the rounded layout normally seen in the messaging application they supposedly came from. Others claimed some images showed signs of editing, while comparisons involving room layouts, furniture and home interiors produced mixed conclusions rather than clear answers.
Questions surrounding the authenticity of the material only intensified after more internet users began comparing individual images frame by frame. Some believed similarities in room decorations, flooring and doors strengthened Si Xiaodi's narrative, while others dismissed those details as coincidence.
This is not the first time Si Xiaodi has found herself surrounded by controversy. Earlier this year she stunned Chinese entertainment circles after declaring online that she had been involved with numerous top celebrities.
Her posts mentioned a long list of famous names, including Lu Han, Tan Jianci, Fan Chengcheng, Lin Gengxin, Cai Xukun, Huang Minghao and several others. Management agencies representing many of those celebrities swiftly denied the allegations and announced legal action.
Si Xiaodi later removed the original posts and wrote that she wanted to focus on herself in the new year, leading many to believe the controversy had finally ended.
 |
| Si Xiaodi Debates With C-Netz |
Instead, the latest round of uploads has reignited public interest. During livestreams, Si Xiaodi insisted she was not worried about potential legal proceedings, maintaining that everything she had shared was genuine.
Her comments generated another wave of discussion, with opinions sharply divided. While some continued supporting her claims, many others questioned her credibility and criticised what they viewed as repeated attempts to create attention through high-profile names. Some C-netz also openly speculated about her state of mind, though such comments remain personal opinions shared online rather than established facts.
As things stand, Lu Han's studio continues to maintain its original legal position, while Si Xiaodi continues defending her claims publicly. No court has established the truth behind the allegations, and several pieces of the widely shared material remain disputed by internet users.